Okay, this is technically NOT a review. But it definitely has tons of spoilers. It’s not so much a judgment of the merits of the film, but more of a discussion on what’s out there…and boy, are there tons of stuff to sift through! The theories abounding is about as convoluted as the plot of the movie itself. True, the basic premise is simple enough to be “gotten” by most, but it’s the tons of details that people are quibbling about. There is so much out there, that I don’t know where to start.
So I decided to share with you the path that I took. It all started when I read the review of Entertainment Weekly’s Owen Glieberman, where he felt like either he’s the only one who did NOT get the film, or everyone’s just pretending to get it, but deep inside actually doesn’t. He didn’t say it directly, but many assumed he was arrogantly implying that if he didn’t get it, then everyone else is lying so as not to appear stupid in the face of global acclaim for the movie. Personally I don’t think he meant it that way, but I think he struck a chord in the heart of the phenomenon. There truly are 3 types of people who watched Inception: the ones who didn’t get it, the ones pretending they got it but actually didn’t, and the people who “got” it. I put air quotes because ask the hundreds of your friends who are RAVING about how great the movie is, and trust me, you’ll get a hundred versions of what they “got”. It’s funny, there are those who loved it, those who hate it because everyone else loves it, and the backlash to the backlash saying they loved it because there are people who hate it just because everyone else loves it. Get it?
Read the full review HERE.
Anyway, back to “getting” the movie, someone actually made a chart explaining all those dream levels and who was dreaming what:
If you want the full-sized version click HERE.
Of course many found flaws to this chart. Level 5 is not limbo, it’s the scene where Cobb talks to Mal in their dining room. Limbo is Level 6, where Cobb meets the old Saito. So there are 6 levels, not 5. And why is Saito much older? Because he died earlier than Cobb, and since time moves faster the deeper the level, a few minutes in a higher level could translate to years in lower levels.
Another contention is, who was dreaming what? Some say Fischer dreamed everything because they couldn’t plant an idea unless it was his dream. Some say Fischer dreamed up to the 3rd level (the hotel), then Eames dreamed the 4th level (the snow fortress), then Cobb dreamed the 5th level (the dining room), and limbo is a shared state. Now many point out that the answer was actually explained in the film earlier. Fischer did NOT dream any of it. That’s why they had an architect create the different levels, they created dreams for Fischer to enter and inhabit with his projections, making him believe that those were his own dreams. So each team member, the one left awake at each level to administer the kick, is the one dreaming that level. So for instance, on the plane, they entered Yusuf’s dream, that’s why they told him he should’ve gone to the bathroom because it was raining in his dream. Since it’s his dream, he stays awake in the van while the rest sleep to go the next level, which Arthur dreamed (the hotel). Since it’s Arthur’s dream, he stays awake to administer the kick later, while the rest sleep, and so on.
Another major point of contention is: was the ending reality or was it still another dream? The spinning totem wobbled, but nothing was definite. The most gripping argument is that even the ending was a dream. The biggest proof? Why did his kids look exactly the same, even the clothes, even the movement, even the lighting, just like the recurring image he has replaying in his mind throughout the whole movie? If that scene hadn’t happened yet, why did he keep seeing it even in the lower dream levels? The strongest argument is that Mal was right. They were still in a dream. When Mal jumped off the building, she woke up in the real “reality”. So when Mal was asking Cobb to question what he considers reality, she wasn’t telling him that reality is limbo (which is below), but that reality is one more level up. She could very well have been trying to wake him up.
And these are just a FEW of the so many details people are debating about, even as I write this. The ones I wrote about is just the tip of the iceberg. But the most compelling argument, the one that quieted all the screaming questions in my head, states that the whole movie was not so much a dream, but a metaphor. Christopher Nolan likens the film watching experience to entering a dream world that it’s creators have manufactured for the audience to enter. Cobb is the director, the architect is the scriptwriter (creating the backbone of the dreams), and so on. And Fisher is the audience, brought into the dream world by its creators to plant ideas in his head. That’s why Ariadne was tasked to not mess around too much with the reality of the dream because if cities started folding, then the dreamer will be suspicious that what what he sees is not real. Much like the audience of a movie, if the plot is too incredible, then the suspension of disbelief ends, the watcher is not drawn into the world of the film, therefore the dream fails.
Read the full article HERE.
The explanation is so simple, yet so brilliant. But of course, only the filmmakers know for sure what the real score is. And I truly hope they never reveal the soul of their work by explaining it. It’s like a poet explaining what his poem was all about…not cool. Before reading this, I thought Inception was a good movie. Now, I concede that it could be one of the greats. And it’s much better when you know your reasons whenever you call a movie good or bad, even if it means getting your answers from other people. There’s nothing wrong if you LOVED the movie. It is equally alright if you HATED it. Just try to figure out the reasons why you say what you say. The true beauty of the film is that it got us all talking. Whether you loved it or you hated it, the movie planted a seed in our collective thinking and pulled us into its world whether we ended up liking what we saw or not. We were exactly like Fischer, unwitting pawns in the hands of a master manipulator, so good that we didn’t even know we were dreaming.
I have read so much about the movie and you’re right that what it makes really more interesting…one critic even say that it’s actually more fun to talk and discuss about it than actually watching it..
I myself honestly got lost in some parts of the movie and would want to watch it again… I loved it because what of what it did to my brain and it got me thinking..
check this out… one of the best of so many discussions about the film on the net…
http://blogs.suntimes.com/scanners/2010/07/inception_again_two_shots_and.html
Inception is rich, complex movie and no one should feel bad if they didn’t “get it.” Unless Nolan spills the full explanation of what the movie is all about, everyone should be happy with what they take away from the film. Isn’t that the beauty of a great movie?
When I first saw it, it felt like it was your usual brain film from Christopher Nolan. I was ready to accept the normal flow of the film. And then, I started hearing and reading about the different interpretations of the film and now, I don’t want to watch it again for the moment, it is starting to get through my skin. And I love it.
There is an interesting interpretation that I got from a friend. That most of the film was Ariadne’s dream. If you’d notice, she was introduced as someone who is highly advanced for her level, much like Cobb’s level, of intelligence. She is a fantastic architect and she was aware of Cobb’s “problem”.
And aren’t we lucky that this year, we have a film that would define 2010.
I do hope an Oscar nomination or even a win for this film.
Kudos to all those who love Inception!
finally! a movie that got us all thinking and talking and thinking and talking ;)) it’s so authentic, raw and enjoyable with its many levels and textures… amazing movie! loved the cast as well.
loved the movie as well… it reminded me of “shutter island” which was awesome too!
i actually think that five levels would make sense. but then again, as this is Nolan’s style, it’s all about perception; how you perceive everything works (or doesn’t) and falls into place (or doesn’t). that’s the beauty of this film, as well as some of his other films – enabling the audience to participate actively in the storytelling and giving them the ability to “personalize” it. whatever you believe in will make sense so as long as you find points that rationalize it.
i’m just reminded by some things that Cobb himself pointed out during the mission – limbo is a vast land of subconscious that if one lands in limbo, the remnants of the creation of a dreamer who had gone there before would likely be found and at the same time, because of it’s vastness, it enables someone who goes there to build a world of his own. ergo, it is possible that there would be no need to “go down” another level. and on the idea of Saito aging, my theory is that once you’re in limbo, have limitless power to manipulate everything, so if you choose to accept limbo as your reality, you could let yourself live and age there or not age at all. it could even be applicable to all dream levels, as the deeper you go, the longer time runs and expires. if we were to strictly follow this principle alone, then aging should have occurred at the very least in Arthur’s level. add to that the idea of escape, which is an entire subject unto itself. in order to get out limbo, there must be a conscious act of killing. but all of this simply follows the assumption of the presence of reality within the film. if one believes otherwise, then there would be an entire set of explanations about how everything was just a dream.
i personally have four theories to the whole ending, two of which are the inverse concept of limbo (this time, reality supersedes the dream instead of the other way around) and the irrelevance of whether all of it happened or not, since the most essential thing was somehow, Cobb had done what he set out to do and got what he wanted in the end be it for real or otherwise. i’m one of those who believe everything happened and everything was real in the end because anything beyond that would cause my brain to melt. i choose to err on the side of simplicity, hahaha. but there’s nobody wrong on this one, i think. if you love it, you love it. and if you don’t love it, then you don’t, and you don’t have to.
Loved the movie because it made me think. I think I got it but after hearing some opinions, I think I don’t really got it.
By the way, you mentioned that in the movie, Cobb’s kids looked the same. Well, I thought they did too but if you are going to check the cast, 2 actors played Phiippa as well as James.
You are right, it’s one great film even if i am sure that i did not get everything. A mind twister indeed. An Oscar worthy film.
Ok, I thought I “got” it, but reading this entry made me re-think what I did “get”. Oh Chico, now you confused me 😦
But I still love Inception =)
My husband and I saw the film last week. It’s okay for me, not loving it but not hating it either. Just your usual recreation for me. Not because of its intellectual approach nor its concepts-trying-to-turn-into-graphics film making. I get the “deepness” of it but I guess I found the film a bit emotion-less through no fault of its own. The actors are great but somehow, it did not move me.
if i were one of the six in the crew, i’d like to be the architect! and for the record, i may not get it after hearing the bruhaha, but i’m more than willing to engage into hours of conversation just for the fun of it. :))
i recommend the film INK…. @louise…
Thanks. Will dl the film.
It is so interesting how so many people has their own take about the movie. I myself thought differently. And yes, with all the analyses & theories going around, I find asking myself, “did I miss something?”. I was “fully engaged” (as Delle had put it) as well. Hmmmmm….attention to details. Sometimes we get all caught up in the details, we tend to lose the big picture.
It’s better to have a more spontaneous discussion…my colleagues and I didn’t really agree as to who got it or didn’t. For me, I focused on the significance of the totem (in Cobb’s case, the top, which was Mal’s totem), the “Fisher” mission. They needed to get into his sub-conscious to get/steal information. Mal was dead, Cobb had to deal or let go of the guilt for “killing” his wife or having drove her to insanity. Adrainne is the architect of the dream / maze. Also, at the start of the movie, Saito found out his was dreaming within a dream because of the carpet. Guy architect out, brilliant Adriane in. And so on…
After all the discussions I had, – it was an open battlefield. I wanted other friends and colleagues to watch it as well…I want to know if they understood it the way I did. If not, I want to know how they took the whole experience. I enjoyed the movie very much, as much as I enjoy discussing it.
Saw this movie twice.. and I realize, it’s actually a simple movie.. we’re just making it more complicated the more we analyze it. Regarding the kids… same clothes pa rin ba? hmmm.. i’m not sure ha (kahit twice ko na napanood?! lol).. pero parang nag-iba yung damit ng girl.. dun kasi sa nakikita ni Cobb, nakapink lang yung bata.. pero sa last part, white and pink na… verify ko na lang ulit! 😀
an interesting take on the movie.
the ring concept: http://revolvingdoorproject.net/2010/07/23/inception-what-happened-at-the-end/
HAVE YOU SEEN NOLAN’S MEMENTO? ITS ONE OF HIS EARLIER WORKS IT STARS GUY PEARCE ITS ONE TRULY BRAIN TWISTING MOVIE. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND IT TO EVERYBODY. NOLAN AT HIS BEST 🙂
I think the last part about Cobb seeing is kids is real. How? Some said there was some sort of cutscene at the end of the credits. Not really a scene but just a sound. A sound implying that the Totem had stopped spinning, which proves the fact that the last scene is in fact real.
yeah that’s what one of my colleague said, you have to stay a bit to hear the totem stopped spinning but no pictures just the sound
In one review, it was mentioned that the kids’ clothes were the same with the ones they had on in cobb’s memories, but their shoes are different. http://bit.ly/ddFZ28
It’s so great, when they start showing the credits, half of the audience are still in their seats — talking about the movie!
You’re right! I agree with you. It is one of the greats!
However, I do want to know what the real deal is. I don’t think knowing it will affect this movie’s “level of greatness,” anyway.
Will definitely get an original DVD for this one and I hope they include specials such as interviews with the writer and director.
Chico, alam mo ba, I keep on thinking about that scene where Mal and Cobb were lying down on the train tracks? That scene haunts me before I sleep. I think I’ve been inception-ized too much by this movie!